Τόμος 35 (2021) – Τεύχος 3 –Άρθρο 5 – Review of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacokinetics – Διεθνής Έκδοση – Volume 35 (2021) – Issue 3 – Article 5 – Review of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacokinetics – International Edition

By | | Πλήρες Κείμενο στα Αγγλικά - Full Text in English
Τίτλος – Title

Maternal Request for Caesarean Section without Medical Indication: A Review of the Literature on Recommendations for Counselling

Συγγραφέας – Author

Paraskevi Giaxi and Kleanthi Gourounti

Department of Midwifery, Faculty of Health and Caring Sciences, University of West Attica, Athens, Greece
Παραπομπή – Citation

P. Giaxi and K. Gourounti. Maternal Request for Caesarean Section without Medical Indication: A Review of the Literature on Recommendations for Counselling. Review Clin. Pharmacol. Pharmacokinet. 2021, 35, 3, 117-122
Ημερομηνία Δημοσιευσης – Publication Date
13-10-2021
Γλώσσα Πλήρους Κειμένου –
Full Text Language

Αγγλικά – English
Λέξεις κλειδιά – Keywords
caesarean delivery, caesarean section, maternal request, maternal demand, elective, planned, maternal decision
Λοιποί Όροι – Other Terms

Μελέτη
Study
Περίληψη – Summary
 Background: Worldwide, a steady rise of cesarean section (CS) rates in high- and middle-income countries over the last decades have initiated concern about the overuse of CS. Caesarean delivery upon maternal request (CDMR) involves a planned primary CS in the absence of a straight forward obstetrical or medical indication to avoid a vaginal birth. Maternal autonomy to choose a planned CS has been a matter of debate among medical professionals and ethicists and guidelines vary between countries regarding how to manage health care professionals these requests. Methods: A review search of electronic databases concerning medical care was held on May 2021 in order to detect published recommendations which describe the proper consultation for non-indicated maternal request on caesarean section. Result: A total of 4 papers which describes the appropriate consultation for women demanding caesarean section without medical indication from: the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), the World Health Organization (WHO), The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and the Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada (SOGC) were included. Conclusion: The caesarean section on women’s request is a topic of international debate in maternal and child health, especially in the light of current growing global concerns over the rising trend of CS. Further research is needed to draw upon direct evidence which will make patient counseling more effective
Αναφορές – References
  1. Dweik D, Sluijs AM. What is underneath the cesarean request? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015 Nov;94(11):1153-5. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12692.
  2. D’Souza R. Caesarean section on maternal request for non-medical reasons: putting the UK National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence guidelines in perspective. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013 Apr;27(2):165-77. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.006.
  3. Barber EL, Lundsberg LS, Belanger K, Pettker CM, Funai EF, Illuzzi JL. Indications contributing to the increasing cesarean delivery rate. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jul;118(1):29-38. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821e5f65.
  4. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 761: Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request. Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jan;133(1):e73-e77. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003006.
  5. Kolås T, Hofoss D, Daltveit AK, Nilsen ST, Henriksen T, Häger R, Ingemarsson I, Øian P. Indications for cesarean deliveries in Norway. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Apr;188(4):864-70. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.217.
  6. Fuglenes D, Aas E, Botten G, Øian P, Kristiansen IS. Maternal preference for cesarean delivery: do women get what they want? Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Aug;120 (2 Pt 1):252-60. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182605b1a.
  7. Karlström A, Rådestad I, Eriksson C, Rubertsson C, Nystedt A, Hildingsson I. Cesarean section without medical reason, 1997 to 2006: a Swedish register study. Birth. 2010 Mar;37(1):11-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2009.00373.x.
  8. Eide KT, Bærøe K. How to reach trustworthy decisions for caesarean sections on maternal request: a call for beneficial power. J Med Ethics. 2020 Oct 14:medethics-2020-106071. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106071.
  9. Ryding EL, Lukasse M, Kristjansdottir H, Steingrimsdottir T, Schei B; Bidens study group. Pregnant women’s preference for cesarean section and subsequent mode of birth – a six-country cohort study. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2016 Sep;37(3):75-83. doi: 10.1080/0167482X.2016.1181055.
  10. Fuglenes D, Aas E, Botten G, Øian P, Kristiansen IS. Why do some pregnant women prefer cesarean? The influence of parity, delivery experiences, and fear. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jul;205(1):45.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.03.043.
  11. Sydsjö G, Möller L, Lilliecreutz C, Bladh M, Andolf E, Josefsson A. Psychiatric illness in women requesting caesarean section. BJOG. 2015 Feb;122(3):351-8. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12714. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
  12. Forstholm MM, Lidegaard O. Sectio på maternal request [Cesarean section on maternal request]. Ugeskr Laeger. 2009 Feb 9;171(7):497-502. Danish.
  13. Sahlin M, Carlander-Klint AK, Hildingsson I, Wiklund I. First-time mothers’ wish for a planned caesarean section: deeply rooted emotions. Midwifery. 2013 May;29(5):447-52. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2012.02.009.
  14. Eide KT, Morken NH, Bærøe K. Maternal reasons for requesting planned cesarean section in Norway: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Mar 29;19(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2250-6.
  15. Council on Patient Safety in Women’s Health Care. Safe reduction of primary cesarean birth (+AIM). Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 2015. Available at: http://safehealthcareforeverywoman.org/ patient-safety-bundles/safe-reduction-of-primary-cesarean-birth/. Retrieved May 2, 2018.
  16. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2021) Caesarean Birth (NICE guidelines NG192). Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng192/chapter/Context [Published: 31 March 2021].
  17. Chen I, Opiyo N, Tavender E, Mortazhejri S, Rader T, Petkovic J, Yogasingam S, Taljaard M, Agarwal S, Laopaiboon M, Wasiak J, Khunpradit S, Lumbiganon P, Gruen RL, Betran AP. Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 28;9(9):CD005528. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005528.pub3.
  18. Alsayegh E, Bos H, Campbell K, Barrett J. No. 361-Caesarean Delivery on Maternal Request. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018 Jul;40(7):967-971. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.12.009.
  19. World Health Organization Human Reproduction Programme, 10 April 2015. WHO Statement on caesarean section rates. Reprod Health Matters. 2015 May;23(45):149-50. doi: 10.1016/j.rhm.2015.07.007. Epub 2015 Jul 27.
  20. Hehir MP, Ananth CV, Siddiq Z, Flood K, Friedman AM, D’Alton ME. Cesarean delivery in the United States 2005 through 2014: a population-based analysis using the Robson 10-Group Classification System. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jul;219(1):105.e1-105.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.04.012. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
Σχετικές Εργασίες – Relative Papers

Online ISSN 1011-6583

Άρθρα Δημοσιευμένα σε αυτό το Περιοδικό Καταχωρούνται στα:
• Chemical Abstracts

• Elsevier’s Bibliographic Databases: Scopus, EMBASE, EMBiology, Elsevier BIOBASE
SCImago Journal and Country Rank Factor

Articles published in this Journal are Indexed or Abstracted in:
• Chemical Abstracts
• Elsevier’s Bibliographic Databases: Scopus, EMBASE, EMBiology, Elsevier BIOBASE
SCImago Journal and Country Rank Factor

Τι είναι η Review of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacokinetics-Διεθνής Έκδοση-Οδηγίες προς τους Συγγραφείς
What is Review of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacokinetics-International Edition-Instrunctions to Authors

Άρθρα Δημοσιευμένα στην Review of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacokinetics-Διεθνής Έκδοση
Articles Published in Review of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacokinetics-International Edition

Συντακτικη Επιτροπή-Editorial Board

Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.