Τόμος 33 (2019) – Τεύχος 1 – Άρθρο 4 – Review of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacokinetics -Διεθνής Έκδοση – Volume 33 (2019) – Issue 1 – Article 4 – Review of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacokinetics – International Edition

By | | Άρθρο - Article, Άρθρο επισκόπησης - Review Article, Βασιλική Καλιδώνη - Vasiliki Kalidoni, Γεώργιος Κρεκούκιας - Georgios Krekoukias, Πλήρες Κείμενο στα Αγγλικά - Full Text in English, Συγγραφέας - Author
Τίτλος – Title

Fetal Electrocardiogram and Cardiotocography: a Mini Review 
Συγγραφέας – Author

Artemis Syrii1, Anna Kokrasvili2, Giannoula Kyrkou1,3, Kleanthi Gourounti4,5

1 RM, BSc, Department of Midwifery, University of West Attica,  Athens, Greece

2 RM, BSc, MSc candidate,Department of Midwifery,University of West Attica, Athens, Greece

3 MSc, PhD, “Attikon” University Hospital, Athens, Greece

4 Assistant Professor, Department of Midwifery, University of West Attica, Athens, Greece

5 President of NGO Society of Cardiotocography and Safe Birth, Athens, Greece
Παραπομπή – Citation
A. Syrii, A. Kokrasvili, G. Kyrkou, K. Gourounti. Fetal Electrocardiogram and Cardiotocography: a Mini Review. Rev. Clin. Pharmacol. Pharmacokinet. 33: 27-29 (2019)
Ημερομηνία Δημοσιευσης – Publication Date
06 Μαρτίου 2019 – 2019-03-06
Γλώσσα Πλήρους Κειμένου – Full Text Language
Αγγλικά – English
Λέξεις κλειδιά – Keywords
cardiotocography, fetal electrocardiogram, ST-Analysis, STAN Monitoring, perinatal outcome
Λοιποί Όροι – Other Terms

Eπισκόπηση
Mini review
Περίληψη – Summary

Electronic fetal monitoring has been widely used during pregnancy and labour the last decades and its aim is to reduce neonatal neurological morbidity. However, its systematic use did not produce the desired results making therefore further embryo monitoring methods necessary. A new electronic fetal monitoring method, based on fetal electrocardiogram (fECG) analysis, can confirm fetal distress in those cases where cardiotocography (CTG) does not give a clear diagnosis
Αναφορές – References
  1. Miller L., Miller D., Tucker S. Mosby’s Pocket Guide to Fetal Monitoring a Multidisciplinary Approach. Edition 7. Elsevier, 2013.
  2. Garite T. J. Intrapartum fetal evaluation. Obstetrics: Normal and problem pregnancies. Edition 5. Philadelphia. 2007.
  3. Parer JT, King TL, Flanders S, et al. Fetal academia and electronic fetal heart rate patterns: is there evidence of an association? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 19(5):289-294, 2006.
  4. Chandraharan E. STAN: An introduction to its use, limitations and caveats. 2010.
  5. Wolfberg Α. The Future of Fetal Monitoring. Reviews in Obstetrics & Gynecology 5(3/4): p132-p136, 2012.
  6. Rosen K. G. et al. Fetal ECG waveform analysis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. Jun;18(3):485-514, 2004.
  7. Amer-Wahlin K., Marsál K. ST analysis of fetal electrocardiography in labor. Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. 2011;(16): 29-35.
  8. I Amer-Wahlin, et al. Fetal electrocardiogram: ST waveform analysis in intrapartum surveillance. BJOG. Oct; 114(10): 1191–1193. 2007.
  9. Amer-Wahlin I, et al. ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram during labour: Nordic observational multicentre study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 12:260–6. 2002.
  10. E Heintz et al. The long-term cost-effectiveness of fetal monitoring during labour: a comparison of cardiotocography complemented with ST analysis versus cardiotocography alone. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 115:1676–1687.
  11. Ellen Blix, et al. ST waveform analysis versus cardiotocography alone for intrapartum fetal monitoring: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 95: 16–27. 2016.
  12. Ewoud Schuit, et al. Effectiveness of electronic fetal monitoring with additional ST analysis in vertex singleton pregnancies at >36 weeks of gestation: an individual participant data metaanalysis. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 208:187.e1-13. 2013.
  13. James P Neilson. Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) for fetalmonitoring during labour (Review). The Cochrane Collaboration. 2015.
  14. Jeroen H. Becker, et al. Predictive value of the baseline T-QRS ratio of the fetal electrocardiogram in intrapartum fetal monitoring: a prospective cohort study. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 91:189–197. 2012.
  15. Jeroen H. Becker, et al. The added predictive value of biphasic events in ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram for intrapartum fetal monitoring. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 94:175–182. 2014.
  16. Lin-Lin Su, Yap-Seng Chong, Arijit Biswas. Use of Fetal Electrocardiogram for Intrapartum Monitoring. Ann Acad Med Singapore 36:416-20. 2007.
  17. Michael A. Belfort, et al. A Randomized Trial of Intrapartum Fetal ECG ST-Segment Analysis. N Engl J Med. 373(7): 632–641. 2015.
  18. Michael A. Belfort, George R. Saade. ST Segment Analysis (STAN) as an Adjunct to Electronic Fetal Monitoring, Part II : Clinical Studies and Future Directions. Clin Perinatol 38: 159–167. Elsevier. 2011.
  19. Michael A. Belfort, George R. Saade. ST Segment Analysis as an Adjunct to Electronic Fetal Monitoring, Part I : Background, Physiology, and Interpretation. Clin Perinatol 38: 143–157. Elsevier. 2011.
  20. Michael P. Nageotte. Fetal heart rate monitoring. Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 1-5. Elsevier. 2015.
  21. Per Olofsson. Current status of intrapartum fetal monitoring: cardiotocography versus cardiotocography + ST analysis of the fetal ECG. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 110: S113–S118. 2003.
  22. Per Olofsson et al. A critical appraisal of the evidence for using cardiotocography plus ECG ST interval analysis for fetal surveillance in labor. Part II: the meta-analyses. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 93:571–586. 2014.
  23. Saccone G, et al. Electrocardiogram ST Analysis During Labor: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Obstet Gynecol. Jan;127(1):127-35. 2016.
  24. Turnbull TL et al. Does ST analysis have a place in electronic fetal monitoring?. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. Mar;30(5):520-524. 2017.
  25. Vayssiere C, et al. Fetal electrocardiogram STsegment analysis and prediction of neonatal acidosis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 97:110–4. 2007.
  26. Vijgen SM et at. Cost-effectiveness of cardiotocography plus ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram compared with cardiotocography only. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Jul;90(7):772-8. 2011.
  27. Ragupathy et al. The use of STAN monitoring in the labour ward. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, July 2010; 30(5): 465–469.
Σχετικές Εργασίες – Relative Papers

Online ISSN 1011-6575

Άρθρα Δημοσιευμένα σε αυτό το Περιοδικό Καταχωρούνται στα:
• Chemical Abstracts

• Elsevier’s Bibliographic Databases: Scopus, EMBASE, EMBiology, Elsevier BIOBASE SCImago Journal and Country Rank Factor

Articles published in this Journal are Indexed or Abstracted in: • Chemical Abstracts • Elsevier’s Bibliographic Databases: Scopus, EMBASE, EMBiology, Elsevier BIOBASE SCImago Journal and Country Rank Factor

Άρθρα Δημοσιευμένα στην Επιθεώρηση Κλινικής Φαρμακολογίας και Φαρμακοκινητικής-Ελληνική Έκδοση Articles Published in Epitheorese Klinikes Farmakologias και Farmakokinetikes-Greek Edition

Συντακτικη Επιτροπή-Editorial Board

Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.