Τόμος 32 (2018) – Τεύχος 1 –Άρθρο 6 – Review of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacokinetics – Διεθνής Έκδοση – Volume 32 (2018) – Issue 1 – Article 6 – Review of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacokinetics – International Edition

By | | Πλήρες Κείμενο στα Αγγλικά - Full Text in English
Τίτλος – Title

An evaluation of Winters moist wound healing theory, and how it has influenced modern day practice
Συγγραφέας – Author

Charalambos Charalambous1, Zoe Roupa2

1RN, BSc, PG Cert WHTR, MPH, Deputy Ward Manager, Acute Trauma and Surgical Unit, North West of Anglia Foundation Trust, Hinchingbrooke Hospital, United Kingdom

2 MD, RN, PhD, Professor, Coordinator of the Nursing Program
and Postgraduate program Contemporary Nursing, University of Nicosia, Cyprus
Παραπομπή – Citation

C. Charalambous, Z. Roupa. An evaluation of Winters moist wound healing theory, and how it has influenced modern day practice. Review Clin. Pharmacol. Pharmacokinet. 2018, 32, 1, 43-49
Ημερομηνία Δημοσιευσης – Publication Date
19-02-2018
Γλώσσα Πλήρους Κειμένου –
Full Text Language

Αγγλικά – English
Λέξεις κλειδιά – Keywords

Winters theory, moist, wound healing, evaluation
Λοιποί Όροι – Other Terms

Μελέτη
Study
Περίληψη – Summary

Abstract: 6 Introduction: The impact of Winter’s research and the establishment of the theory and concept of moist wound healing radically changed the way that wounds are treated and contributed to the initiation of further research and materials development.

Objective: To evaluate the evidence of Winters theory of moist wound healing, and how this has influenced mod- ern day clinical practice.

Methodology: The scientific literature was reviewed through Cinahl, Pub-med, EBSCO, Medline and Google scholar, 51 scientific articles where identified. The arti- cles where chosen due to their correlation with the ob- jective under study and their scientific relevance.

Result: Whilst the research provides relatively convinc- ing results to support the principals of moist wound heal- ing, subsequent research has not been able to provide such dramatic results. The moist vapour transmission rate of each dressing and the specific needs of each wound should be addressed upon the choice of treat- ment in clinical environment. Lastly moist wound healing promotes less pain during dressing changes and pre- vents the development of pathogen microorganisms.

Conclusion: Winter’s work and subsequent research were pivotal and has demonstrated that moist wound healing holds beneficial abilities towards wound healing. This has influenced the development and implementa- tion of modern techniques and equipment in wound care.
Αναφορές – References

1. Mandy G. Neonatal outcome, complications, and man-

agement of multiple births. UptoDate, 2014.
2. Jones D. Triplet pregnancy: Early pregnancy manage- ment. UptoDate, 2014.
3. Leftwich HK, Zaki MN, Wilkins I, Hibbard JU. Labor pat- terns in twin gestations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013, 209: 254.
4. Kuohung W, Ginsburg E, Racowsky C. Strategies to control the rate of high order multiple gestation. UptoDate, 2014.
5. Chasen S, Chervenak F. Twin pregnancy: Prenatal is- sues. UptoDate, 2014.
6. Matias A, Montenegro N, Loureiro T, Cunha M, Duarte S, Freitas D et al. Screening for twin-twin transfusion syndrome at 11-14 weeks of pregnancy: the key role of ductus venosus blood flow assessment. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010, 35: 142-8.
7. Dias T, Ladd S, Mahsud-Dornan S, Bhide A, Papageorghiou AT, Thilaganathan B. Systematic labeling of twin pregnancies on ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011, 38: 130-3.
8. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence: Guidance. Multiple Pregnancy: The Management of Twin and Triplet Pregnancies in the Antenatal Period. RCOG Press 2011.
9. Simonazzi G, Curti A, Farina A, Pilu G, Bovicelli L, Rizzo N. Amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling in twin ges- tations: which is the best sampling technique? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010, 202: 365.
10. Chauhan SP, Scardo JA, Hayes E, Abuhamad AZ, Berghella V. Twins: prevalence, problems, and preterm births. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010, 203: 305-15.
11. Supadilokluck S, Tongprasert F, Tongsong T, Wanapirak C, Piyamongkol W, Sirichotiyakul S et al. Amni- ocentesis in twin pregnancies. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2009, 280: 207-9.
12. Daskalakis G, Anastasakis E, Papantoniou N, Mesogitis S, Antsaklis A. Second trimester amniocentesis in assisted conception versus spontaneously conceived twins. Fertil Steril 2009, 91: 2572-7.

13. Agarwal K, Alfirevic Z. Pregnancy loss after chorionic villus sampling and genetic amniocentesis in twin pregnan- cies: a systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012, 40: 128-34.

14. Derom C, Gielen M, Peeters H, Frijns JP, Zeegers MP. Time trends in the natural dizygotic twinning rate. Hum Reprod 2011, 26: 2247-52.
15. Hoekstra C, Zhao ZZ, Lambalk CB, Willemsen G, Martin NG, Boomsma DI et al. Dizygotic twinning. Hum Reprod Update 2008, 14: 37-47.

16. Ananth CV, Chauhan SP. Epidemiology of twinning in developed countries. Semin Perinatol 2012, 36: 156-61.
17. Macfarlane AJ1, Blondel B2, Mohangoo AD3, Cuttini M4, Nijhuis J5, Novak Z6 et al. Wide differences in mode of delivery within Europe: risk-stratified analyses of aggregated routine data from the Euro-Peristat study. BJOG. 2016 Mar; 123: 559-68.

18. Steinman G. Mechanisms of twinning: X. The male factor. J Reprod Med 2008, 53: 681-4.
19. Asklund C, Jensen TK, Jorgensen N, Tabor A, Sperling L, Skakkebaek NE. Twin pregnancy possibly associated with high semen quality. Hum Reprod 2007, 22: 751-5.

20. Hall JG. Twinning. Lancet 2003, 362: 735-43.
21. Kivelä A1, Kauppila A, Ylöstalo P, Vakkuri O, Leppäluoto J. Seasonal, menstrual and circadian secretions of melatonin, gonadotropins and prolactin in women. Acta Physiol Scand. 1988 Mar; 132: 321-7.
22. Young BC, Wylie BJ. Effects of twin gestation on mater- nal morbidity. Semin Perinatol 2012, 36: 162-8.
23. Foo J, Mangos G, M.A. Brown M. Characteristics of hypertensive disorders in twin versus singleton pregnancies. Elsevier, 2013.
24. Chowdhury S, Hussain MA. Maternal complications in twin pregnancies. Mymensingh Med J 2011, 20: 83-7.
25. Cleary-Goldman J, Malone FD, Vidaver J, Ball RH, Nyberg DA, Comstock CH et al. Impact of maternal age on obstetric outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2005, 105: 983-90.
26. Jahromi BN, Husseini Z. Pregnancy outcome at mater- nal age 40 and older. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2008, 47: 318-21.
27. Khalil A, Syngelaki A, Maiz N, Zinevich Y, Nicolaides KH. Maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcome: a co- hort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013, 42: 634-43.
28. Bryson CL, Ioannou GN, Rulyak SJ, Critchlow C. Asso- ciation between gestational diabetes and pregnancy- induced hypertension. Am J Epidemiol 2003, 158: 1148-53. 29. Mastrogiannis DS, Spiliopoulos M, Mulla W, Homko CJ. Insulin resistance: the possible link between gestational diabetes mellitus and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Curr Diab Rep 2009, 9: 296-302.
30. Bonney E, Rathod M, Cohen K, Ferriman E. Twin preg- nancy. Elsevier, 2013.

31. Crowther CA, Han S. Hospitalisation and bed rest for multiple pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010,7: CD000110.
32. Simhan H, Caritis S. Inhibition of acute preterm labor. UptoDate, 2014.

33. Zork N, Biggio J, Tita A, Rouse D, Gyamfi-Bannerman C. Decreasing prematurity in twin gestations: predicaments and possibilities. Obstet Gynecol 2013, 122: 375-9.
34. Roman AS, Saltzman DH, Fox N, Klauser CK, Istwan N, Rhea D et al. Prophylactic cerclage in the management of twin pregnancies. Am J Perinatol 2013, 30: 751-4.

35. Liu AL, Yung WK, Yeung HN, Lai SF, Lam MT, Lai FK et al. Factors influencing the mode of delivery and associated pregnancy outcomes for twins: a retrospective cohort study in a public hospital. Hong Kong Med J 2012, 18: 99-107.

36. Bateni ZH1, Clark SL1, Sangi-Haghpeykar H1, Aagaard KM1, Blumenfeld YJ2, Ramin SM1 et al. Trends in the de- livery route of twin pregnancies in the United States, 2006- 2013. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Oct; 205: 120-6.

37. Engelbrechtsen L, Nielsen E, Perin T, Oldenburg A, Tabor A, Skibsted L et al. Cesarean section for the second twin: a population- based study of occurrence and outcome. Birth 2013, 40: 10.

38. Schmitz T, Carnavalet Cde C, Azria E, Lopez E, Cabrol D, Goffinet F. Neonatal outcomes of twin pregnancy accord- ing to the planned mode of delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2008, 111: 695 703.

39. Alexander JM, Leveno KJ, Rouse D, Landon MB, Gilbert SA, Spong CY et al. Cesarean delivery for the second twin. Obstet Gynecol 2008, 112: 748-52.
40. Vaughan D, Cleary B, Murphy D. Delivery outcomes for nulliparous women at the extremes of maternal age – a cohort study. BJOG 2013.

41. Antsaklis A, Malamas FM, Sindos M. Trends in twin pregnancies and mode of delivery during the last 30 years: inconsistency between guidelines and clinical practice. J Perinat Med 2013, 41: 355-64.

42. Hogle KL, Hutton EK, McBrien KA, Barrett JF, Hannah ME. Cesarean delivery for twins: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003, 188: 220-7.
43. Kamath BD, Todd JK, Glazner JE, Lezotte D, Lynch AM. Neonatal outcomes after elective cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2009, 113: 1231-8.

44. Schanler R, Potak D. Breastfeeding: Parental education and support. UptoDate, 2014.
45. Ladomenou F, Kafatos A, Galanakis E. Risk factors related to intention to breastfeed, early weaning and subop- timal duration of breastfeeding. Acta Paediatr 2007, 96: 1441-4.

46. Flidel-Rimon O, Shinwell ES. Breast feeding twins and high multiples. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2006, 91: 377-80.
47. Abrams S, Hurst N. Breastfeeding the preterm infant. UptoDate, 2014.
Σχετικές Εργασίες – Relative Papers

Online ISSN 1011-6583

Άρθρα Δημοσιευμένα σε αυτό το Περιοδικό Καταχωρούνται στα:
• Chemical Abstracts

• Elsevier’s Bibliographic Databases: Scopus, EMBASE, EMBiology, Elsevier BIOBASE
SCImago Journal and Country Rank Factor

Articles published in this Journal are Indexed or Abstracted in:
• Chemical Abstracts
• Elsevier’s Bibliographic Databases: Scopus, EMBASE, EMBiology, Elsevier BIOBASE
SCImago Journal and Country Rank Factor

Τι είναι η Review of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacokinetics-Διεθνής Έκδοση-Οδηγίες προς τους Συγγραφείς
What is Review of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacokinetics-International Edition-Instrunctions to Authors

Άρθρα Δημοσιευμένα στην Review of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacokinetics-Διεθνής Έκδοση
Articles Published in Review of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacokinetics-International Edition

Συντακτικη Επιτροπή-Editorial Board

Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.