Τόμος 31 (2017) – Τεύχος 3 –Άρθρο 3 – Review of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacokinetics – Διεθνής Έκδοση – Volume 31 (2017) – Issue 3 – Article 3 – Review of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacokinetics – International Edition

By | | Πλήρες Κείμενο στα Αγγλικά - Full Text in English
Τίτλος – Title

International Financial Reporting Standards and the Pharmaceutical Industry
Συγγραφέας – Author

Marios Sotiropoulos

Bsc, Msc International Business,

Dps Management Consultants Senior Associate
Παραπομπή – Citation

M. Sotiropoulos. International Financial Reporting Standards and the Pharmaceutical Industry. Review Clin. Pharmacol. Pharmacokinet. 2017, 31, 3, 147-150
Ημερομηνία Δημοσιευσης – Publication Date
2017
Γλώσσα Πλήρους Κειμένου –
Full Text Language

Αγγλικά – English
Λέξεις κλειδιά – Keywords

FRS, Pharma, Financial Comparability, GAAP, EU Financial Direction
Λοιποί Όροι – Other Terms

Μελέτη
Analysis
Περίληψη – Summary

Generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) were the guidelines for companies bookkeeping. Each country or state had its own accounting principles and most of them in a total different manner. The globalization of economy brought up the issue of financial comparability.  In this direction, EU issued a direction for international accepted accounting principles, which affect all EU listed companies. Pharmaceutical corporations are a big proportion among them
Αναφορές – References
      1. Aboody, D., & Kaznik, R. (2000). CEO stock option awards and the timing of corporate voluntary disclosures. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29(1), 73−100.
      2. ASB, 2011. About ASB. [Online] Available at: http://www.frc.org.uk/asb/about/
      3. Ball, R., Kothari, S., & Robin, A. (2000). The effect of international institutional factors on properties of accounting earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29(1), 1−51.
      4. Ball, R., Robin, A., & Wu, J. (2003). Incentives versus standards: Properties of accounting income in four east Asian countries. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 36,235−270.
      5. Bradshaw, M. T., B. J. Bushee, and G. S. Miller (2004). Accounting choice, home bias, and
      6. s. investment in non-u.s. firms. Journal of Accounting Research 42 (5), 795–841.
      7. Bushman, R., & Smith, A. (2001). Financial accounting information and corporate governance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32, 237−334.
      8. Carnachan, R. (2003). “The case for competition between US GAAP and IFRS in US capital ” Working paper, Harvard Law School.
      9. Christie, A. A., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1994). Efficient and opportunistic choices of accounting procedures: Corporate control contests. The Accounting Review, 69, 539−566.
      10. Christensen, H., & Nikolaev, V. (2009). Who uses fair value accounting for non-financial assets after IFRS adoption? University of Chicago Booth School of
      11. Working paper, no. 09-12
      12. Clarkson, P., Guedes, J., & Thompson, R. (1996). On the diversification, observability, and measurement of estimation risk. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31 (1), 69-84.
      13. Cooper, I. and E. Kaplanis (1986). Costs to crossborder investment and international equity market equilibrium. In Recent Developments in Corporate Finance, pp. 209–240. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
      14. De Franco, G., S.P. Kothari, and R. Verdi. The benefits of firm comparability. Working paper, University of Toronto and MIT Sloan School of Management.
      15. DeFond M, Park C (1997) Smoothing income in anticipation of future earnings. Journal of Accounting & Economics 23: 115–139.
      16. Diamond, D., & Verrecchia, R. (1991). Disclosure, liquidity, and the cost of capital. The Journal of Finance, 66, 1325−1355.
      17. El-Gazzar, S., Finn, P., & Jacob, R. (1999). An empirical investigation of multinational firms’ compliance with international accounting standards. The International Journal of Accounting, 34(2), 239−248.
      18. Gelb, D.S. & Zarowin, P.2002, Review of Accounting Studies 7: 33.
      19. Joos, P. and Wysocki, P., 2007. (Non)convergence in international accrual accounting. Working Paper, MIT,Sloan School of Management.
      20. Haller, A. (1992). The Relationship of Financial and Tax Accounting in Germany: A Major Reason For Accounting Disharmony in Europe. International Journal of Accounting, 27(2), 310 – 323.
      21. Holger Daske, Günther Gebhardt,(2006), International financial reporting standards and experts’ perceptions of disclosure quality,ABACUS, Volume 42, Issue 3-4,September 2006,Pages 461–498
      22. (2011, August 12). Industry Classification Benchmark. Retrieved August 12, 2011, from ICB: http://www.icbenchmark.com/ICBDocs/Structure_Defs_English.pdf
      23. Kasznik,R, (1999), On the Association between Voluntary Disclosure and Earnings Management, ournal of Accounting Research,Vol. 37, No. 1 (Spring, 1999), pp. 57-81
      24. Lawrence R. Glosten and Paul Milgrom,1985, Bid, ask and transaction prices in a specialist market with heterogeneously informed traders, Journal of Financial Economics, 1985, vol. 14, issue 1, 71-100
      25. Leuz, C., & Verrecchia, R. (2000). The economic consequences of increased disclosure. Journal of Accounting Research, 38, 91−124.
      26. Leuz, C. (2003). IAS versus U.S. GAAP: Information asymmetry-based evidence from Germany’s new market. Journal of Accounting Research, 41(3), 445−472.
      27. Leuz, C., Nanda, D., & Wysocki, P. (2003). Earnings management and investor protection: An international comparison. Journal of Financial Economics, 69(3), 505−528.
      28. Meeks, G., & Swann, P. (2009). Accounting Standards and the Economics of Standards. Accounting and
      29. Business Research , 39,(3), 191-210. [Online] Available: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1182042
      30. Scholes, M. S., Wilson, G. P., & Wolfson, M. A. (1992). Firms’ responses to anticipated reduction in tax rates: The Tax Reform Act of 1986.Journal of Accounting Research, 30, 161−185 Supplement.
      31. Paul M. Healy and Krishna G. Palepu 2001, Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature, Journal of Accounting and Economics, , vol. 31, issue 1-3, pages 405-440
      32. Scholes, M., G. Wilson, and M. Wolfson. 1992. Firms’ responses to anticipated reductions in tax rates: The Tax Reform Act of 1986. Journal of Accounting Research 30: 161–185.
      33. Street, D.L., Nichols, N.B. and Gray, S.J. (2000). “Segment disclosures under SFAS No.131: has business segment reporting improved?” Accounting Horizons, September, pp.259-285.
      34. Tarca, A. (2004). “International Convergence of Accounting Practices: Choosing Between lAS and U.S. GAAP”, Journal of International Financial Management .
      35. Van Tendeloo, B and Vanstraelen (2005): ‘Earning Management under German GAAP versus IFRS’. European Accounting Review, Vol.14 (1), pp.155-180.
      36. Verrecchia, R. (2001). Essays on disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32, 97−180.
      37. Watts, R., & Zimmerman, J. (1990, January). Positive accounting theory: A ten year perspective. The Accounting Review, 131−156.
      38. Nobes, C. & Kvaal, E., 2010. International differences in IFRS policy choice: a research note. Accounting & Business Research , pp. Vol.40. No2, pp.173-187.
      39. Waehrisch, Mark; Weahrisch, Mark;. Publication Date:2001-10-19. ISBN-10:3631383231 … Advanced Financial Reporting A Complete Guide to IFRS.
      40. Zeff, S., 1999. The coming confrontation on International Accounting Standards. Irish Accounting Review, pp. Vol. 5, No. 2, pp.89-117..
      41. Zeff, S., 2007. Some obstacles to global financial reporting comparability and convergence at a high level of quality. British accounting Review, pp. Vol. 39, pp. 290-302.
Σχετικές Εργασίες – Relative Papers

Online ISSN 1011-6583

 

Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.